What is Economic capital?
Economic capital represents the emerging best practice for measuring and reporting all kinds of risk across a financial organization. It is called "economic" capital because it measures risk in terms of economic realities rather than potentially misleading regulatory or accounting rules. It is called economic "capital" because part of the measurement process involves converting a risk distribution to the amount of capital that is required to support the risk, in line with the institutions target financial strength (eg. credit rating).
While some risk distributions can be calculated with more certainty than others - market risks tend to be more amenable than operating risks, for example - the approach can be applied in principle to almost all bank risks, and to any business line. Economic capital therefore provides management with a standardized unit, a dollar of economic capital, for comparing and discussing opportunities and threats. Economic capital numbers can also be multiplied by an institutions equity hurdle rate (the minimum acceptable rate of return on equity) to offer a cost of risk number that is comparable to other kinds of bank expense.
As such, economic capital offers an enterprise-wide language for discussing and pricing risk that is related directly to the principal concerns of management and other key stakeholders: institutional solvency and profitability.
As Warren Buffett has stated, one of the most important jobs of a CEO or CFO is capital allocation. Shareholders entrust management to invest their capital wisely, knowing exactly where it is invested, and what return they can expect on it. Management should also make sure that any capital generated by a business unit is reinvested wisely.
In manufacturing organizations, capital investment is easy to understand because it is largely required to finance plant and equipment. However, it is more difficult to understand where capital is invested in financial institutions, because capital is required to support risk.
Therefore, in order to understand where your shareholders capital is invested, you must understand the risks in your financial institution. This is the motivation behind Economic Capital linking risk to required capital.
A bank should undertake an assessment of capital adequacy at least once a year. Capital adequacy is determined by making a comparison between calculated Economic Capital and actual capital held by the institution.
Whether over or undercapitalized, firms can now take action as follows:
One of the most immediate benefits of measuring Economic Capital is the ability to measure return on equity (ROE) at any level within an organization business unit, products, customers, or even transactions. This is an important input into the strategic planning process identifying which activities to grow, shrink, or fix.
Although financial institutions have attempted to adopt an ROE discipline through the use of such approaches as Economic Value Added (EVA), they are missing one of the most important issues understanding how much equity is required for each activity. Economic Capital provides a sound theoretical basis for attributing Economic Capital to all activities.
Comprehensive risk measurement: the model should address the full range of risks faced by the institution, including all credit, interest rate, market, and operational risks and should utilize stress tests of key parameters that would affect the size of exposures or degree of risk, e.g., for subprime lending: delinquency rates, recovery rates, attrition rates, and utilization rates.
Objective and statistically sound linkage of risk to capital: an example of this would be a statistically measured maximum probability of becoming insolvent in conjunction with a target public agency debt rating.
Economic capital represents the emerging best practice for measuring and reporting all kinds of risk across a financial organization. It is called "economic" capital because it measures risk in terms of economic realities rather than potentially misleading regulatory or accounting rules. It is called economic "capital" because part of the measurement process involves converting a risk distribution to the amount of capital that is required to support the risk, in line with the institutions target financial strength (eg. credit rating).
While some risk distributions can be calculated with more certainty than others - market risks tend to be more amenable than operating risks, for example - the approach can be applied in principle to almost all bank risks, and to any business line. Economic capital therefore provides management with a standardized unit, a dollar of economic capital, for comparing and discussing opportunities and threats. Economic capital numbers can also be multiplied by an institutions equity hurdle rate (the minimum acceptable rate of return on equity) to offer a cost of risk number that is comparable to other kinds of bank expense.
As such, economic capital offers an enterprise-wide language for discussing and pricing risk that is related directly to the principal concerns of management and other key stakeholders: institutional solvency and profitability.
As Warren Buffett has stated, one of the most important jobs of a CEO or CFO is capital allocation. Shareholders entrust management to invest their capital wisely, knowing exactly where it is invested, and what return they can expect on it. Management should also make sure that any capital generated by a business unit is reinvested wisely.
In manufacturing organizations, capital investment is easy to understand because it is largely required to finance plant and equipment. However, it is more difficult to understand where capital is invested in financial institutions, because capital is required to support risk.
Therefore, in order to understand where your shareholders capital is invested, you must understand the risks in your financial institution. This is the motivation behind Economic Capital linking risk to required capital.
A bank should undertake an assessment of capital adequacy at least once a year. Capital adequacy is determined by making a comparison between calculated Economic Capital and actual capital held by the institution.
Whether over or undercapitalized, firms can now take action as follows:
One of the most immediate benefits of measuring Economic Capital is the ability to measure return on equity (ROE) at any level within an organization business unit, products, customers, or even transactions. This is an important input into the strategic planning process identifying which activities to grow, shrink, or fix.
Although financial institutions have attempted to adopt an ROE discipline through the use of such approaches as Economic Value Added (EVA), they are missing one of the most important issues understanding how much equity is required for each activity. Economic Capital provides a sound theoretical basis for attributing Economic Capital to all activities.
Comprehensive risk measurement: the model should address the full range of risks faced by the institution, including all credit, interest rate, market, and operational risks and should utilize stress tests of key parameters that would affect the size of exposures or degree of risk, e.g., for subprime lending: delinquency rates, recovery rates, attrition rates, and utilization rates.
Objective and statistically sound linkage of risk to capital: an example of this would be a statistically measured maximum probability of becoming insolvent in conjunction with a target public agency debt rating.